| Frequency distribution (%) | |
|---|---|
| In favor of the respondent's side | 34 |
| In favor of the opposed side | 46 |
| Agreement between the sides was reached | 9 |
| There was no court ruling | 3 |
| Other | 5 |
| DK | 2 |
| RA | 2 |
VERDFAV: Whose favour was the verdict?
Question text: Whose favour was the decision made?
Note: The question was asked to the respondents, who himself, family member, close relative or close friend had several court experience during the last 2 years.
Values:
- In favor of the respondent's side
- In favor of the opposed side
- Agreement between the sides was reached
- There was no court ruling
- Other
- DK
- RA
VERDFAV in other datasets:
Single datasets
- Knowledge and Attitudes of the Population of Georgia towards Judiciary, 2018
- Attitudes towards the Judicial System in Georgia, 2014
Time-series datasets
Attitudes towards the Judicial System in Georgia, 2011
Attitudes towards the Judicial System in Georgia, 2011
Analyze responses
This study is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of CRRC Georgia and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government, or East-West Management Institute.
- Note: In some cases the percentages do not add up to 100 due to decimal points and rounding.
- Please use the following citation when citing data from ODA:
The Caucasus Research Resource Centers. (dataset year) "[dataset name - e.g. Caucasus Barometer]". Retrieved through ODA - http://caucasusbarometer.org on {date of accessing the database here}.